In the event the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only done When the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as petitioner company responded for the allegations as such they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to get appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The ruling on the first court created case regulation that must be followed by other courts right until or unless both new regulation is created, or simply a higher court rules differently.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the summary or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to really make it correct towards the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision from the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Just some years ago, searching for case precedent was a challenging and time consuming endeavor, demanding people today to search through print copies of case legislation, or to buy access check here to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case legislation search possibilities, and many sources offer free access to case law.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised of the boy’s past, they asked if their children were Secure with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they had almost nothing to fret about.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents in the boy or Female do not approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they could Minimize off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by regulation.
The DCFS social worker in charge from the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-month report to your court, the worker elaborated within the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. If the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the ninety days to the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we are guided through the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include all notable cases decided through the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually well set up now that the provision for proforma promotion just isn't alien or unfamiliar for the civil servant service framework however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it can be lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may perhaps if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled to generally be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to your Federation/ province during the higher post, direct that such civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of these types of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may possibly search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more